![]() To my eye, it compares well to the third jpg which was generated by darktable with the defringe and the d7200 profile applied. Here are three close up crops that show the point I was discussing better. Maybe I could have, had you checked the "Store Original" box and allowed me to enlarge them. ![]() Sorry, these tired old eyes can't see the difference. (For what it is worth, I am using the most recent unstable testing version of Darktable but the stable version has most of the features you want, other than perspective adjustments).I have been experimenting with Darktable as a repl. I hope this helps those considering Darktable. (For what it is worth, I am using the most recent unstable testing version of Darktable but the stable version has most of the features you want, other than perspective adjustments). I am not yet able to get my film negative scans using a macro lens to look proper in Darktable-I am very good at this in Lightroom-but I do not do this on the road in any event. I have been able to make the same kind of adjustments to ordinary photos. Certainly as a replacement on the road for Capture NX-D and maybe even for Lightroom. My sense is that Darktable can do very well. So, I have been looking at this option for awhile. I prefer to use Linux to go online when traveling as I perceive it to be more secure, etc. I installed Linux and it runs Darktable reasonably well-the same computer would not work well using Lightroom, I do not think. For $350 I was able to get a low end version of an 11 inch Lenovo Yoga 710. But what got me interested was my desire to travel with a small and inexpensive computer which I might use to make some photo edits. I have not wanted to sign up for Lightroom 6 (I still use 5.7) and I do not care for the idea of a subscription. It is somewhat of a coincidence that all of a sudden there is great interest in dumping lightroom based on Adobe announcements. The last JPG is the Darktable version with the d7200 base curve and defringing activated. I have attached a basic NX-D export and Darktable export, so you can see the differences. Here is where you would change the base curve setting and activate the defringe module. You go into the "darkroom" tab to activate modules and to change them. The picture orientation, the base curve and the white balance. When you start over, I find that you have 3 initial settings active. Also, on the right side of the screen you can go into the "history stack" and click discard to basically start over with your adjustments. You do this from the lower right portion of the screen. First, you must be in the lighttable tab to export files to JPG. If you want to experiment with Darktable to see what other settings might do, this is a good starting point.Ī few other matters might be of help for testing. With the selection of the specific base curve and the defringing option turned on, I was able to get a starting point to experiment with further changes which appeared, at least as to color, virtually identical to the Nikon generated options. Local average slow did a more complete job to my eye, and fine adjustments were possible using sliders. Here, you have many adjustments in Darktable-the two generic options being "global average fast" and "local average slow". However, this was corrected easily by activating the "defringe" module in Darktable. However, the default JPG generated by Darktable did display some purple fringing. The camera JPG and the Capture NX-D generated JPGs did not display purple fringing. The second difference I noted related to defringing. ![]() When you select this base curve, the colors of the JPGs all appear identical. However, if you right click on the base curve line in Darktable, you will get many other base curve choices, including one for the D7200. This was a little bit darker in color/tone than the other JPGs. The base curve automatically selected by Darktable was something called "nikon like alternate". The output was very similar-but with two differences. I then loaded the same NEF file into Darktable and similarly generated a JPG without making any adjustments. No surprise, but the two seemed identical (and I made no adjustments using Capture NX-D). I first used a NEF file to export a JPG using Capture NX-D and compared it to the basic JPG generated by the camera. I have left the camera settings at SD, ISO 400, auto white balance. For others who may wish to do so, I have a few initial observations about how to do comparisons.Īs background, I am doing my testing using a Nikon D7200 and the 35mm 1.8 dx lens, shooting a NEF file with a large basic JPG. I have been experimenting with Darktable as a replacement for Lightroom and Capture NX-D.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |